Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 12:14:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6FE3A734F210A1F92F81931D2FFD35EB0B0EE846D8A4DFDE7E2EF148830D7CF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

While it was never 100% confirmed, it has been debunked that this is not Sunak. Missing facial properties and an rather weaker alibi strengthen the fact that it was not him. https://youtu.be/gnmFY6uII9M

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688798228492239042
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6FE3A734F210A1F92F81931D2FFD35EB0B0EE846D8A4DFDE7E2EF148830D7CF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1691496877255
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16887982284922390426FE3A734F210A1F92F81931D2FFD35EB0B0EE846D8A4DFDE7E2EF148830D7CF1