Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 12:59:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0351FCD9378FD51B1C450D8AA47C427949135F102A49AB01C5A3FBC9E1832C38
Participant Details

Original Note:

While it was never 100% confirmed, it has been debunked that this is not Sunak. Missing facial properties and an rather weaker alibi strengthen the fact that it was not him. https://youtu.be/gnmFY6uII9M

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688798228492239042
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0351FCD9378FD51B1C450D8AA47C427949135F102A49AB01C5A3FBC9E1832C38
  • createdAtMillis - 1691499596404
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16887982284922390420351FCD9378FD51B1C450D8AA47C427949135F102A49AB01C5A3FBC9E1832C38