Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 21:09:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FEB940E9F5D09F0F1F69CEA2253AD758EEC96EEDC09CDB4B00119E05A045E24E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. It was the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority involved in this case. They only adjudicate the code of conduct for the British pharmaceutical industry, not clinical trials or products. It had nothing to do with the safety or efficacy of the vaccine. https://www.techarp.com/facts/pfizer-ceo-guilty-vaccine-uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1688735177231737322
participantId -
raterParticipantId - FEB940E9F5D09F0F1F69CEA2253AD758EEC96EEDC09CDB4B00119E05A045E24E
createdAtMillis - 1691528961958
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1688735177231737322FEB940E9F5D09F0F1F69CEA2253AD758EEC96EEDC09CDB4B00119E05A045E24E