Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-16 17:57:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3C101F06DE57CD41D427AC12E61D5B44127BEF745C3D230A685DEC07F7041E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. It was the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority involved in this case. They only adjudicate the code of conduct for the British pharmaceutical industry, not clinical trials or products. It had nothing to do with the safety or efficacy of the vaccine. https://www.techarp.com/facts/pfizer-ceo-guilty-vaccine-uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1688735177231737322
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B3C101F06DE57CD41D427AC12E61D5B44127BEF745C3D230A685DEC07F7041E3
createdAtMillis - 1692208661411
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1688735177231737322B3C101F06DE57CD41D427AC12E61D5B44127BEF745C3D230A685DEC07F7041E3