Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 21:08:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75AB7F2F0FAFE0339C40F87A10F66C3434F07B9FBD4393C02FFBE6C894F26549
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. It was the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority involved in this case. They only adjudicate the code of conduct for the British pharmaceutical industry, not clinical trials or products. It had nothing to do with the safety or efficacy of the vaccine. https://www.techarp.com/facts/pfizer-ceo-guilty-vaccine-uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1688735177231737322
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 75AB7F2F0FAFE0339C40F87A10F66C3434F07B9FBD4393C02FFBE6C894F26549
createdAtMillis - 1691528917692
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 168873517723173732275AB7F2F0FAFE0339C40F87A10F66C3434F07B9FBD4393C02FFBE6C894F26549