Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 14:36:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49EF1AF985AFC31EDB716308AF72E291E2374E5DB26CD3530CE88D5094E8B347
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. It was the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority involved in this case. They only adjudicate the code of conduct for the British pharmaceutical industry, not clinical trials or products. It had nothing to do with the safety or efficacy of the vaccine. https://www.techarp.com/facts/pfizer-ceo-guilty-vaccine-uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1688735177231737322
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 49EF1AF985AFC31EDB716308AF72E291E2374E5DB26CD3530CE88D5094E8B347
createdAtMillis - 1691505404382
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 168873517723173732249EF1AF985AFC31EDB716308AF72E291E2374E5DB26CD3530CE88D5094E8B347