Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 16:11:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2CEED1569117AACE95F09A79D0CE269986C2491C81D8D0C97EAE7DC20983FAB0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. It was the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority involved in this case. They only adjudicate the code of conduct for the British pharmaceutical industry, not clinical trials or products. It had nothing to do with the safety or efficacy of the vaccine. https://www.techarp.com/facts/pfizer-ceo-guilty-vaccine-uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1688735177231737322
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2CEED1569117AACE95F09A79D0CE269986C2491C81D8D0C97EAE7DC20983FAB0
createdAtMillis - 1691511082419
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16887351772317373222CEED1569117AACE95F09A79D0CE269986C2491C81D8D0C97EAE7DC20983FAB0