Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 06:01:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F827862298E6248E105067695376DAB6CA1AD2CE3F0D2622332F1D679D0A63B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

論文の正確性に疑義を唱えるような内容のツイートですがミスリードであることに留意する必要があります 本庶教授のこの発言は科学では常識を疑っていくことで新たな発見につながるという例示で、論文そのものの信用性を疑っている発言ではありません https://www.buzzfeed.com/jp/keiyoshikawa/honjo-kyoto

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688707946002502041
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F827862298E6248E105067695376DAB6CA1AD2CE3F0D2622332F1D679D0A63B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1691560860090
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1688707946002502041F827862298E6248E105067695376DAB6CA1AD2CE3F0D2622332F1D679D0A63B2