Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 21:46:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98C46597D2E713E332303820E0C3B317EB21DF6419F1D79273D8FC4D1E419BBA
Participant Details

Original Note:

論文の正確性に疑義を唱えるような内容のツイートですがミスリードであることに留意する必要があります 本庶教授のこの発言は科学では常識を疑っていくことで新たな発見につながるという例示で、論文そのものの信用性を疑っている発言ではありません https://www.buzzfeed.com/jp/keiyoshikawa/honjo-kyoto

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688707946002502041
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98C46597D2E713E332303820E0C3B317EB21DF6419F1D79273D8FC4D1E419BBA
  • createdAtMillis - 1691531183850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 168870794600250204198C46597D2E713E332303820E0C3B317EB21DF6419F1D79273D8FC4D1E419BBA