Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 01:27:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09C760B956D839B5669586885AD063A68AE51C4F3DD35465A302C083C8FEC271
Participant Details

Original Note:

論文の正確性に疑義を唱えるような内容のツイートですがミスリードであることに留意する必要があります 本庶教授のこの発言は科学では常識を疑っていくことで新たな発見につながるという例示で、論文そのものの信用性を疑っている発言ではありません https://www.buzzfeed.com/jp/keiyoshikawa/honjo-kyoto

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688707946002502041
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 09C760B956D839B5669586885AD063A68AE51C4F3DD35465A302C083C8FEC271
  • createdAtMillis - 1691458050343
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168870794600250204109C760B956D839B5669586885AD063A68AE51C4F3DD35465A302C083C8FEC271