Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 05:24:57 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E8D8B2D8BFC9F8B611E04AB9069EF494980FFC7111F559B2382BEF252FA4CFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Top note is right Note of "This is a police account expressing a factual claim - they do not claim a crime was committed" is wrong Tweet says the goods were "obviously not bought (for personal consumption)", and the goods were SEIZED! Cops can't SEIZE goods w/out assumed crime

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688551667086626918
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E8D8B2D8BFC9F8B611E04AB9069EF494980FFC7111F559B2382BEF252FA4CFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1691472297504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16885516670866269186E8D8B2D8BFC9F8B611E04AB9069EF494980FFC7111F559B2382BEF252FA4CFA