Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-07 18:10:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D64B745BD5B65BABEF07990D445B81211A748189B445F947CB2601F4461345A
Participant Details

Original Note:

やや誤解を招くツイートです。 ツイートの内容の通り、コミュニティノートを付けられた人は「再審査」を要求することが出来ます。 https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/ja/contributing/additional-review ツイート主の言う「偏ったノート」が付けられて再審査を要求しても、ノートの評価は多数決で決まる訳ではないので、(https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/ja/contributing/diversity-of-perspectives )必ずしも結果が覆る訳では無いことに注意が必要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688498199529660744
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D64B745BD5B65BABEF07990D445B81211A748189B445F947CB2601F4461345A
  • createdAtMillis - 1691431838068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16884981995296607447D64B745BD5B65BABEF07990D445B81211A748189B445F947CB2601F4461345A