Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 09:52:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C2B0A2ACD42215DA22FB95D4B4D3AE4F7E1D5394AD645BD18051BDE7D6CC2CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet gives a very short summary of the opinion expressed in the link to the substack article. As such the tweet is correct. There is no need for a community note. If you do not agree with the argumentation in the article, write a comment there or a tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688475699072364576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C2B0A2ACD42215DA22FB95D4B4D3AE4F7E1D5394AD645BD18051BDE7D6CC2CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1691574737466
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16884756990723645761C2B0A2ACD42215DA22FB95D4B4D3AE4F7E1D5394AD645BD18051BDE7D6CC2CF