Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 05:26:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EC0D269AE49FF63248F9D836E8B222BAC2F518E975C0297D809EB49C620E37B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Article provides only vague description https://archive.is/yNlxO#selection-979.0-979.305 of a system flagging "correspondence" containing broadly defined "abuse", including expression of "negative sentiment". Mere expression of negative sentiment https://twitter.com/BBCNewsnight/status/1019704657017430016 would not nescessarily fit reasonable person's understanding of term abuse.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1688471971862843767
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0EC0D269AE49FF63248F9D836E8B222BAC2F518E975C0297D809EB49C620E37B
createdAtMillis - 1691558770042
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16884719718628437670EC0D269AE49FF63248F9D836E8B222BAC2F518E975C0297D809EB49C620E37B