Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-07 17:30:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A64695495FF88CBD95E956482D5E27E7D68BDA70922D02B51B3102A39E3B7587
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Note, welche behauptet, dass Kernenergie subventioniert wurde, liegt falsch. Quelle: https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/14/080/1408084.pdf (S. 16, Antwort 27) Statt der 2011 eingeführten Kernbrennstoffsteuer hätte man ja einfach die angeblichen Subventionen streichen können. Die gab es aber nie. Quelle: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernbrennstoffsteuer

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1688435819185357210
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A64695495FF88CBD95E956482D5E27E7D68BDA70922D02B51B3102A39E3B7587
createdAtMillis - 1691429426099
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1688435819185357210A64695495FF88CBD95E956482D5E27E7D68BDA70922D02B51B3102A39E3B7587