Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 20:52:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5F51F5BE5B6172B2F936053149E24D77ABEDAB5CD1F803A82AC4019A91AE91E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN : L'article/édito de Libération prend certes parti mais n'est pas factuellement faux, les notes ci-dessus relèvent de l'opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688279595051577733
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5F51F5BE5B6172B2F936053149E24D77ABEDAB5CD1F803A82AC4019A91AE91E
  • createdAtMillis - 1691355178158
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1688279595051577733A5F51F5BE5B6172B2F936053149E24D77ABEDAB5CD1F803A82AC4019A91AE91E