Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 11:16:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DFE5F5061BE1066712AB07B43766EF975B3EC07A4C3A2140E6990167AEADEB31
Participant Details

Original Note:

While there may be different studies telling a different story, comment is merely linking to an article. One may disagree with the article. Article about 'A [one] new analysis by Dr. Konstantin Beck' seems valid. Comment is not making broader claims than a link to the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688117250555842851
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DFE5F5061BE1066712AB07B43766EF975B3EC07A4C3A2140E6990167AEADEB31
  • createdAtMillis - 1691320616678
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1688117250555842851DFE5F5061BE1066712AB07B43766EF975B3EC07A4C3A2140E6990167AEADEB31