Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 07:57:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2615B84F4CC385D60F889E9DE8A33A6960A11DD4A3733F98693F7E0003FD4DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sie Behauptung aus dem Tweet ist eindeutig nicht erkennbar, im Gegenteil, wer Wacken kennt weiß, warum der Mann getragen wurde, Sachlich betrachtet ist der Inhalt des Tweets eine billige Lüge.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688048632971280527
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2615B84F4CC385D60F889E9DE8A33A6960A11DD4A3733F98693F7E0003FD4DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1691308636783
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1688048632971280527C2615B84F4CC385D60F889E9DE8A33A6960A11DD4A3733F98693F7E0003FD4DA