Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 13:22:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9ECCE15085A01702096C7E2B2C76CE9A818CB705BE091FDF2BBAEC5F8F64CD78
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sie Behauptung aus dem Tweet ist eindeutig nicht erkennbar, im Gegenteil, wer Wacken kennt weiß, warum der Mann getragen wurde, Sachlich betrachtet ist der Inhalt des Tweets eine billige Lüge.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688048632971280527
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9ECCE15085A01702096C7E2B2C76CE9A818CB705BE091FDF2BBAEC5F8F64CD78
  • createdAtMillis - 1691328133607
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16880486329712805279ECCE15085A01702096C7E2B2C76CE9A818CB705BE091FDF2BBAEC5F8F64CD78