Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 07:17:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9413BDD51F3EF185BBCC92DA5EE2C9C2B5A3C8791FD130E1B57DBB8AE06D97B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sie Behauptung aus dem Tweet ist eindeutig nicht erkennbar, im Gegenteil, wer Wacken kennt weiß, warum der Mann getragen wurde, Sachlich betrachtet ist der Inhalt des Tweets eine billige Lüge.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688048632971280527
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9413BDD51F3EF185BBCC92DA5EE2C9C2B5A3C8791FD130E1B57DBB8AE06D97B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1691306262128
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16880486329712805279413BDD51F3EF185BBCC92DA5EE2C9C2B5A3C8791FD130E1B57DBB8AE06D97B4