Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 11:10:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C80066329502F7F0E2BE9AB2DD37B174A2C97B4831E3C36EC75D578EEF34C85
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sie Behauptung aus dem Tweet ist eindeutig nicht erkennbar, im Gegenteil, wer Wacken kennt weiß, warum der Mann getragen wurde, Sachlich betrachtet ist der Inhalt des Tweets eine billige Lüge.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688048632971280527
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C80066329502F7F0E2BE9AB2DD37B174A2C97B4831E3C36EC75D578EEF34C85
  • createdAtMillis - 1691320222465
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16880486329712805278C80066329502F7F0E2BE9AB2DD37B174A2C97B4831E3C36EC75D578EEF34C85