Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 08:58:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BE88BCD4AC1F0567051522B082EB1B55C80AF027D3095D97680AD3D7A0D21ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sie Behauptung aus dem Tweet ist eindeutig nicht erkennbar, im Gegenteil, wer Wacken kennt weiß, warum der Mann getragen wurde, Sachlich betrachtet ist der Inhalt des Tweets eine billige Lüge.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688048632971280527
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0BE88BCD4AC1F0567051522B082EB1B55C80AF027D3095D97680AD3D7A0D21ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1691312313748
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16880486329712805270BE88BCD4AC1F0567051522B082EB1B55C80AF027D3095D97680AD3D7A0D21ED