Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 06:02:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6058AFB5078025B0F55D81A068F94A6AD76FCC12AD9985AEB5FADF74B03920E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該ツイートに関しては、避妊具の重要性ではなく「公金の使い方」の問題提起を目的としています。 また、このツイートによって避妊具の有用性が否定されることも考えにくいため、コミュニティノートは不要であると考えられます。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688038229973553268
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6058AFB5078025B0F55D81A068F94A6AD76FCC12AD9985AEB5FADF74B03920E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1691301772327
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16880382299735532686058AFB5078025B0F55D81A068F94A6AD76FCC12AD9985AEB5FADF74B03920E5