Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-07 00:48:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8C1B5F2E33C3722ECC69924C7694CE19BED63DA4BEB13710B2451057ADB977E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet misrepresents importance of this finding, as the article states "our findings...may have limited clinical utility." Statistical significance doesn't equal real world significance, especially when the confidence interval of the hazard ratio approaches 1.0 (no difference). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687990114897822021
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8C1B5F2E33C3722ECC69924C7694CE19BED63DA4BEB13710B2451057ADB977E
  • createdAtMillis - 1691369280034
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1687990114897822021B8C1B5F2E33C3722ECC69924C7694CE19BED63DA4BEB13710B2451057ADB977E