Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-07 05:46:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BC6907AE4F2CE7CD84535FBF37CE408BF26FCF424FE7F038CB51D03E12DF6DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet misrepresents importance of this finding, as the article states "our findings...may have limited clinical utility." Statistical significance doesn't equal real world significance, especially when the confidence interval of the hazard ratio approaches 1.0 (no difference). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687990114897822021
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BC6907AE4F2CE7CD84535FBF37CE408BF26FCF424FE7F038CB51D03E12DF6DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1691387215360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16879901148978220217BC6907AE4F2CE7CD84535FBF37CE408BF26FCF424FE7F038CB51D03E12DF6DD