Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 14:47:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 24A4566B68623857FF034FC6912B0C283445D996303B103CD81F8F76A2300B14
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet misrepresents importance of this finding, as the article states "our findings...may have limited clinical utility." Statistical significance doesn't equal real world significance, especially when the confidence interval of the hazard ratio approaches 1.0 (no difference). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687990114897822021
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 24A4566B68623857FF034FC6912B0C283445D996303B103CD81F8F76A2300B14
  • createdAtMillis - 1691506021518
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168799011489782202124A4566B68623857FF034FC6912B0C283445D996303B103CD81F8F76A2300B14