Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 11:24:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2485311EF40B37B69113D6190E4A9954F77E9B002518463B30D42923FE457083
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet misrepresents importance of this finding, as the article states "our findings...may have limited clinical utility." Statistical significance doesn't equal real world significance, especially when the confidence interval of the hazard ratio approaches 1.0 (no difference). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687990114897822021
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2485311EF40B37B69113D6190E4A9954F77E9B002518463B30D42923FE457083
  • createdAtMillis - 1691493844674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16879901148978220212485311EF40B37B69113D6190E4A9954F77E9B002518463B30D42923FE457083