Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-07 03:00:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BD47C7568154F38C2A90F1A2A9A7573F52415E24DBE18110B4B5641400EE005
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet misrepresents importance of this finding, as the article states "our findings...may have limited clinical utility." Statistical significance doesn't equal real world significance, especially when the confidence interval of the hazard ratio approaches 1.0 (no difference). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687990114897822021
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0BD47C7568154F38C2A90F1A2A9A7573F52415E24DBE18110B4B5641400EE005
  • createdAtMillis - 1691377233019
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16879901148978220210BD47C7568154F38C2A90F1A2A9A7573F52415E24DBE18110B4B5641400EE005