Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 13:01:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B31F9348478C7C84EB141B4AB492EC2D1FFE9A57CC3F5C319D6C66AE6DB9E65
Participant Details

Original Note:

 逸話の紹介程度のツイートに根拠の有無を持ち出す必要性は低い。  よって、当該ツイートにノートを付ける必要はないものと思われる。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687899291288010965
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B31F9348478C7C84EB141B4AB492EC2D1FFE9A57CC3F5C319D6C66AE6DB9E65
  • createdAtMillis - 1691499689293
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16878992912880109652B31F9348478C7C84EB141B4AB492EC2D1FFE9A57CC3F5C319D6C66AE6DB9E65