Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 19:26:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA3CC9EB6D280A31020B69CD4C1DF69FB7500B3EEF37951AF8472DC3A0882D56
Participant Details

Original Note:

La propia imagen que adjunta en el tweet desmiente su propio tweet. La persona actuó como procurador, no como abogado. Vito Quiles también oculta las respuestas al tweet de otros que demuestran que la información que da es falsa.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687797181917385175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA3CC9EB6D280A31020B69CD4C1DF69FB7500B3EEF37951AF8472DC3A0882D56
  • createdAtMillis - 1691263591212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687797181917385175DA3CC9EB6D280A31020B69CD4C1DF69FB7500B3EEF37951AF8472DC3A0882D56