Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 13:02:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7EFF1F160CBE6F3B447051E2E3213B39D727D1F3DD307B84F72A52FF95C1C65
Participant Details

Original Note:

La propia imagen que adjunta en el tweet desmiente su propio tweet. La persona actuó como procurador, no como abogado. Vito Quiles también oculta las respuestas al tweet de otros que demuestran que la información que da es falsa.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687797181917385175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7EFF1F160CBE6F3B447051E2E3213B39D727D1F3DD307B84F72A52FF95C1C65
  • createdAtMillis - 1691240528254
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687797181917385175C7EFF1F160CBE6F3B447051E2E3213B39D727D1F3DD307B84F72A52FF95C1C65