Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 07:49:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AD724DF2F26DE8E8B657C9A56600F78DD7993808114C3A19AC0CDE28E764F52
Participant Details

Original Note:

La propia imagen que adjunta en el tweet desmiente su propio tweet. La persona actuó como procurador, no como abogado. Vito Quiles también oculta las respuestas al tweet de otros que demuestran que la información que da es falsa.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687797181917385175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AD724DF2F26DE8E8B657C9A56600F78DD7993808114C3A19AC0CDE28E764F52
  • createdAtMillis - 1691308199068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16877971819173851756AD724DF2F26DE8E8B657C9A56600F78DD7993808114C3A19AC0CDE28E764F52