Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 20:38:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6428F51DC8897F94376A0C3A0CF3EE231E5F7227883268F90E67655A6D1AC834
Participant Details

Original Note:

La propia imagen que adjunta en el tweet desmiente su propio tweet. La persona actuó como procurador, no como abogado. Vito Quiles también oculta las respuestas al tweet de otros que demuestran que la información que da es falsa.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687797181917385175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6428F51DC8897F94376A0C3A0CF3EE231E5F7227883268F90E67655A6D1AC834
  • createdAtMillis - 1691354282213
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16877971819173851756428F51DC8897F94376A0C3A0CF3EE231E5F7227883268F90E67655A6D1AC834