Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 07:12:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E9ED4DA2534C204667A10F348DFB17E9B4B4F5B417F922652C4EA7EC7DE09D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

La propia imagen que adjunta en el tweet desmiente su propio tweet. La persona actuó como procurador, no como abogado. Vito Quiles también oculta las respuestas al tweet de otros que demuestran que la información que da es falsa.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687797181917385175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E9ED4DA2534C204667A10F348DFB17E9B4B4F5B417F922652C4EA7EC7DE09D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1691305942333
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16877971819173851753E9ED4DA2534C204667A10F348DFB17E9B4B4F5B417F922652C4EA7EC7DE09D4