Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 21:49:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0835AD1F162373948E017D0E9D7EF4FD4E737E94F21718B6B5A52926CFE71D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post is misleading. A yes vote is not specifically for constitutional recognition, but for enshrining a Voice to Parliament in the Constitution. The difference between recognition and a Voice is contentious and therefore should be noted. https://voice.gov.au/referendum-2023/referendum-question-and-constitutional-amendment

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687776980379550189
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0835AD1F162373948E017D0E9D7EF4FD4E737E94F21718B6B5A52926CFE71D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1691358559547
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1687776980379550189B0835AD1F162373948E017D0E9D7EF4FD4E737E94F21718B6B5A52926CFE71D1