Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 15:01:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F775B77ED9E9F19AF2389CCA8CCE1B23A11C0E3EB50C444449B972F0DCE692BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is totally unverifiable, potentially offensive conjecture from a well-known commentator.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687761417326227834
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F775B77ED9E9F19AF2389CCA8CCE1B23A11C0E3EB50C444449B972F0DCE692BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1691247669596
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687761417326227834F775B77ED9E9F19AF2389CCA8CCE1B23A11C0E3EB50C444449B972F0DCE692BE