Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 11:31:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20B26BB3FED0AB4E1D98D7FA24822ED2638772D0E41428B1E40B09A726C820DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is totally unverifiable, potentially offensive conjecture from a well-known commentator.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687761417326227834
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20B26BB3FED0AB4E1D98D7FA24822ED2638772D0E41428B1E40B09A726C820DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1691235105325
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 168776141732622783420B26BB3FED0AB4E1D98D7FA24822ED2638772D0E41428B1E40B09A726C820DC