Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 15:02:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E794D5C86AA9FE05BCF57BC42DDBF5BF13A859E5FE022FEA13079C1E0F0BF8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is totally unverifiable, potentially offensive conjecture from a well-known commentator.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687761417326227834
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E794D5C86AA9FE05BCF57BC42DDBF5BF13A859E5FE022FEA13079C1E0F0BF8D
  • createdAtMillis - 1691247727248
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16877614173262278341E794D5C86AA9FE05BCF57BC42DDBF5BF13A859E5FE022FEA13079C1E0F0BF8D