Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 18:19:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C86E1F4BEA1C37A63D60107FB707D089CF4D60297048AC6A1E8712DFECEDAFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Account posting is a satire account and not actually DiscussingFilm. https://twitter.com/discussingfilm?s=21&t=xWK8IgPtD5ZJNodFw2ApIA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687636400114487509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C86E1F4BEA1C37A63D60107FB707D089CF4D60297048AC6A1E8712DFECEDAFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1691259560784
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16876364001144875094C86E1F4BEA1C37A63D60107FB707D089CF4D60297048AC6A1E8712DFECEDAFB