Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-04 18:54:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E15F50F49E1B8AB37EFD216F08B3DCB94D9A8C31AE3431D9A65501FED0103D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'information ici délivrée n'est pas vraiment utile et ne nécessite pas la mention "FLASH". Mais la publication en elle-même reste intéressante et même si subjective (comme le précise l'utilisation de guillemets «"efficace à 90%"»).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687537278917214209
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E15F50F49E1B8AB37EFD216F08B3DCB94D9A8C31AE3431D9A65501FED0103D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1691175246911
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16875372789172142090E15F50F49E1B8AB37EFD216F08B3DCB94D9A8C31AE3431D9A65501FED0103D4