Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-04 04:47:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F66BBCEA52C846BBBC7AAC6E28D869F44D17CFE078897BFEEC77908A1AD2F3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is misleading. It lumps anyone who doesn't agree with the science (undefined) as "anti-science". In science, being skeptical does not mean doubting the validity of everything, nor does it mean being cynical. A person can be skeptical without being "anti-science". https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/11/the-republican-party-isnt-really-the-anti-science-party/281219/ https://cbc-network.org/2012/04/skepticism-over-politicized-science-is-not-anti-science/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687258800125083648
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F66BBCEA52C846BBBC7AAC6E28D869F44D17CFE078897BFEEC77908A1AD2F3B
  • createdAtMillis - 1691124427848
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16872588001250836484F66BBCEA52C846BBBC7AAC6E28D869F44D17CFE078897BFEEC77908A1AD2F3B