Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-04 10:59:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 964A0D51106A4BBCC86D4963710020F3768B9650C44F3F50C902E29DDF2A4DFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although you would have made that much money, the chart doesn't show the many startups that failed. Further, the ad merely presents itself alongside those attractive startups, but doesn't guarantee that the advertised product would get you access to startups of similar quality.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687136518945542144
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 964A0D51106A4BBCC86D4963710020F3768B9650C44F3F50C902E29DDF2A4DFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1691146778007
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687136518945542144964A0D51106A4BBCC86D4963710020F3768B9650C44F3F50C902E29DDF2A4DFB