Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-04 03:21:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The survey question referenced asks about the "scientific community", not about "science". These two could be different, for example if unscrupulous scientists maintain the trappings of science (like papers), but subvert the method. A historical example of that is Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687108529948336129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1691119288184
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687108529948336129FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED