Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-04 06:42:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4192B2D656A70A8FB59A9EDF8FC5AFD0ACBFB7D204CF26CB1F264A0A1168C0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The survey question referenced asks about the "scientific community", not about "science". These two could be different, for example if unscrupulous scientists maintain the trappings of science (like papers), but subvert the method. A historical example of that is Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687108529948336129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4192B2D656A70A8FB59A9EDF8FC5AFD0ACBFB7D204CF26CB1F264A0A1168C0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1691131330316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687108529948336129E4192B2D656A70A8FB59A9EDF8FC5AFD0ACBFB7D204CF26CB1F264A0A1168C0C