Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-03 18:45:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9A4ED28E79800F1CB374F289F7FA484BD5A034D5B87B586AF86BC3C9BF5DEA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The survey question referenced asks about the "scientific community", not about "science". These two could be different, for example if unscrupulous scientists maintain the trappings of science (like papers), but subvert the method. A historical example of that is Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687108529948336129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9A4ED28E79800F1CB374F289F7FA484BD5A034D5B87B586AF86BC3C9BF5DEA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1691088346754
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687108529948336129D9A4ED28E79800F1CB374F289F7FA484BD5A034D5B87B586AF86BC3C9BF5DEA2