Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-03 14:47:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E86A4E18FDB5C79C1A1C654360A812423DBBF38FD9E43289051D8D536A857B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The survey question referenced asks about the "scientific community", not about "science". These two could be different, for example if unscrupulous scientists maintain the trappings of science (like papers), but subvert the method. A historical example of that is Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687108529948336129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E86A4E18FDB5C79C1A1C654360A812423DBBF38FD9E43289051D8D536A857B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1691074035971
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16871085299483361299E86A4E18FDB5C79C1A1C654360A812423DBBF38FD9E43289051D8D536A857B6