Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-03 19:13:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The survey question referenced asks about the "scientific community", not about "science". These two could be different, for example if unscrupulous scientists maintain the trappings of science (like papers), but subvert the method. A historical example of that is Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687108529948336129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1691090006561
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16871085299483361290DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C