Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-03 17:56:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 743C51E3B3D46F5A3F0B47E9015F653B6283BD0F14FF589974F3DCC12D575F94
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fake account, and does not post on behalf of the New Yorker

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687093839444738048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 743C51E3B3D46F5A3F0B47E9015F653B6283BD0F14FF589974F3DCC12D575F94
  • createdAtMillis - 1691085388996
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687093839444738048743C51E3B3D46F5A3F0B47E9015F653B6283BD0F14FF589974F3DCC12D575F94