Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-04 11:01:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46F9E20A6BC9891A99F3B3EEF9F29090294810488915E24EED315C3CE7ACBE6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fake account, and does not post on behalf of the New Yorker

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687093839444738048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46F9E20A6BC9891A99F3B3EEF9F29090294810488915E24EED315C3CE7ACBE6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1691146919119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168709383944473804846F9E20A6BC9891A99F3B3EEF9F29090294810488915E24EED315C3CE7ACBE6D