Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-04 02:16:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3931E4E86CD580E253AAADFDD68C207E4EE89E2CDD42A06D6A6AD856CC37BED0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fake account, and does not post on behalf of the New Yorker

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687093839444738048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3931E4E86CD580E253AAADFDD68C207E4EE89E2CDD42A06D6A6AD856CC37BED0
  • createdAtMillis - 1691115388910
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16870938394447380483931E4E86CD580E253AAADFDD68C207E4EE89E2CDD42A06D6A6AD856CC37BED0